Aunque no verificamos reclamaciones concretas porque las opiniones son propiedad de sus autores, es posible que marquemos las opiniones como «verificadas» si podemos confirmar que ha tenido lugar una interacción con la empresa. Más información
Para proteger la integridad de la plataforma, nuestro software automatizado disponible las 24 horas examina todas las opiniones en nuestra plataforma, tanto si están verificadas como si no. Esta tecnología está diseñada para identificar y eliminar contenido que incumpla nuestras directrices, incluidas las opiniones que no están basadas en una experiencia real. Sabemos que es posible que no detectemos todo pero puedes denunciar lo que pienses que se nos haya escapado. Más información
Clickbait articles such as, "2026’s First Wave of Anime Releases Officially Proves Shorter Seasons Are Better," are shown with a long thread of comments disagreeing, this shows their takes aren't reputable and only meant to attract a audience. As well as this they claim it's, "officially proven," but miss the true nuance that people prefer longer anime over shorter higher quality ones
Waste of time to read any articles or content from this source. They write whatever it takes to get clicks. Lies and exaggerated or fictional content are all they offer.
They wrote an entire article trying to claim that Netflix is the go to streaming site for anime based on a survey of a whooping 8600 people out of the millions that watch anime on various sites and apps. It's completely biased and misdirecting people with the title. Which is something I've noticed them and a lot of other so called journalist doing a lot lately
I don't get the hate. CBR is a go-to site for me for anime and mcu articles. Sure they used to be very bloggy but I find they've come a long way in terms of content quality.
Clickbait, constant ads and non original content. This site used to have something, but once it was acquired by a bigger media company they have lost their sense of purpose.
CBR.com is running a fraud recruiment campaing on Linkendin. They will qualify you for a sample article after applying and upon submitting your sample they will say you are not eligible and forward your sample article to the editor team for edit and resubmission. I have checked it myself, my submitted article was edited and published on their website. Don't fall for such scam projects.
I've read a manga called Naruto. And it also consists of various novels and databooks. And analysing characters isn't simple many people, websites have a wrong analysis about characters and cbr is one of them. The strongest character in the anime (kaguya) is in the 7th position and the one who supposed to be in the bottom line of the strongest (kakashi) is in the top. They got to analyse with more legit proof rather than making the rankings as they wish.
Cualquiera puede escribir una reseña en Trustpilot. El autor de la opinión tiene derecho a editarla o eliminarla en cualquier momento y solo se mostrará mientras su cuenta esté activa.
Las empresas pueden solicitar opiniones a través de invitaciones automáticas. Esta opiniones, etiquetadas como verificadas, tratan sobre experiencias genuinas.
Más información sobre otros tipos de reseñas.
Trabajamos con especialistas y tecnología avanzada para salvaguardar nuestra plataforma. Descubre cómo combatimos las reseñas falsas.
Más información sobre el proceso de revisión de Trustpilot.
La verificación puede ayudar a garantizar que sean personas reales las que escriben opiniones que aparecen en Trustpilot.
Ofrecer incentivos a cambio de opiniones o pedirlas de forma selectiva puede sesgar el TrustScore, lo que contraviene nuestras directrices.
