GCP Central Opiniones 174

I really do appreciate for your efforts in preparation of this course! It was concise, informative and easy to use.
Let me please make some comments regarding the typos:
1) Chapter "Principles and Scope", "Updated GCP Principles", p.3, 1st Table. There is a typo in the header of the table, instead "ICH E6(R3) PRINCIPLE", "ICH R6(R3) PRINCIPLE" is written.
2) Chapter "Preparation", "Roles & Responsibilities: Sponsors", "Requirements for IPs with Marketing Authorisation" section, 1st sentence. There is a typo "... and batch sample management.e management." at the end of it.

Training was very clear and logical build.

The structure and content, including the notes and exercises, are well-organized, clear, and easy to follow, making the learning experience highly effective.

Nice, not boring and relevant update course

Good, comprehensive summary of ICH-GCP E6(R3)
Questions are motivating to search more information
In the video's important information is summarized, not to long

Well, from a didactic point of view it was pretty shit. Only texts to read, no interactive content like videos or lectures from professionals. The questions in between the text blocks referred to topics not yet explained or where so far apart from the teached content that they left a negative impression and removed the last shreds of motivation after reading text for hours. I have listend to a GxP course beforehand and was furthermore astounded that topics like ALCOA where not mentioned. So, bad teaching style, the exams questions where not covered sometimes in the teached material and overall unimpressive methods. Unworthy of more than one star.

Ok in general but not user friendly and lack of videos and interactive module

training nam veel meer tijd in beslag dan de voorgeschreven 3 uur

The set up of this elearning was completely illogical: theoretical questions asked before providing a proper theoretical framework, no proper overview of relevant (inter-)national laws, being bombarded with irrelevant stock pictures, interviews and "e mails with peers". I would sincerely suggest to review this e-learning to make it more concise and complete.

Many useful materials are available and I like the interview and email session that are vivid for readers to learn like from practice.

I liked the way information was presented. Information could be somewhat more practical though. The exam is difficult with a lot of grammatical errors or very long sentences. Also sometimes two answers can be right and it is a guess what they want.

The subject matter was well presented although, sometimes the letter seize and contrast can be improved

Easy to follow.

it's a good training about a complex subject

I found the course setup to be unhelpful. I became overwhelmed with information, which made it difficult to maintain a clear overview. Additionally, during the separate modules, questions were often posed before the relevant information was presented. This frequently resulted in incorrect answers or frustration, as I was left wondering, 'How should I know? I haven’t read this yet.' It would be more effective to ask these questions after each module.

Furthermore, a wide variety of training techniques are employed, including videos, questions, polls, animations, case studies, interviews, email conversations, and numerous additional downloadable documents whose purposes are often unclear. I suggest streamlining these methods by selecting only a few to enhance clarity and coherence throughout the course.

it was usefull to learn about updates and new procedures, without

Good structure of the training, relevant examples, clear explanation.
More information with regard to qualitative research would be nice.

Comprehensive and efficient overview of the EU-CTR legislation

Sehr übersichtliche Lernplattform. Kurs gut in Unterkategorien unterteilt.

Duidelijke informatie en was zeer verhelderend.