JADE Learning Opiniones 

Was easy to navigate and was convenient to switch back and forth between reading material and test questions. Will use JADE again upon next license renewal cycle.

It’s convenient and easy to use and can be finished easily.

Electrical CEU. The AI continually made mistakes, the worst was the repeated use of arubin florens for the AWG designation. It is American wire gauge. Not the money of aruba.

My hours haven't been received by the state yet. I Info for my Jade Account I can't find my Card Number or any type of verification my courses were actually sent or received. The new system is not user friendly!

Information was presented in a clean and efficient manner. Course could be done at my leisure and JADE delivered like they always have in the past.

I did not like the way reciprocation worked. I never could get it to work out. The course was not enjoyable, the screen is full of the title and what you are looking at is so small. I have used JADE for years but I think I will try a different company in the future. It was so much better before

very good test

Been using Jade for literally years. I like the illustrations and how in depth it goes about each change in the NEC

I couldn't get login in to do the corse. I've been doing your courses for about 20 years. Since I couldn't do it I no long have my electrical license.

I had two different CEU classes that were not sent to Washington State L&I

I was so disappointed how few topics the course covered. It certainly covered only the minimum requirements for electrical license renewal. I don’t think we even covered all of Chapter 1 of the NEC. I ended up waiting more than an hour for the timer to expire. That’s an hour lost that I could have done some real learning!

I have used Jade Learning for over 20 years. This year was a terrible experiences. Jade has gotten money hungry.

Got my hours but had to rewatch videos that I already watched to complete required hours... Pain. and have the option to change the AI voice.

In all the years of using Jade, worst experience ever, had to use a different website to complete my training because I couldn’t log in…now I need to make contact for a refund for a course that I paid for and couldn’t use!

New format is not nearly as conducive to absorbing/retaining the new code material as the old format. I’ve used Jade for 20 years. It is more expensive than other CE’s, but I was always glad to pay it because the format & content was VERY good. I wanted to learn the application of new code changes & Jade was great for that. Not so much anymore. I told everyone I know how good Jade was, not anymore. I will go back to Jade next year to see if it’s the same (new) format & if it is I’ll go elsewhere. Previously you didn’t have to pay until you were done w/the course, now you pay before you begin.

Jade didn't Report Completion of Course to State Immediatly Like Pace. Had to Wait Weeks. No Response to my emails. I Finally had to call to get Results Which were my downloading my Completion Certificates to the State My Self.

Always learn something new. And convenient.

Working with Rachel Tyson on reciprocation.....saved a lot of time and money!

So please with the experience with JADE learning, very efficient way of learning

Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback.

I have used Jade Learning for my continuing education since 2003, and this was by far the most frustrating experience I've had with the program.

I understand that the courses are designed to meet the required eight hours, but the recent changes made the sections feel much longer without making them more engaging. If the additional time had been spent on more interesting or interactive content, the experience would have been much better. Instead, it often felt like the material had simply been stretched out.

I was also frustrated by the number of quiz questions that seemed deliberately ambiguous. For continuing education, the goal should be reinforcing knowledge and helping learners understand the material, not testing their ability to interpret vague wording. Those questions felt unnecessarily confusing and didn't add educational value.

The final section requiring review of the 2023 code also felt like a poor use of time. Since the course is focused on current continuing education, spending so much time reviewing an outdated code edition made it difficult to stay engaged and didn't feel particularly relevant.

By the end of the course, I felt more like I had endured a hardship than completed a worthwhile learning experience. That is not how continuing education should feel.

I've chosen Jade Learning for my continuing education every year since 2003 because my previous experiences were positive. Unfortunately, this version has made me seriously reconsider whether I'll use Jade Learning again in the future. I hope you'll take this feedback into consideration and make changes that prioritize clear instruction, engaging content, and an effective learning experience.