Salus Living Opiniones 

I am also experiencing the same issue, open with them in may 4 unit and i have been scam over £16000 , they where showing me the portal where the unit were been booked and i never received any payment. I havent heard from them since over 2 weeks now. Am writing these so other people dont fall victims. Please if anyone want to get in touch, i need help to get my money back

This is my second review, These characters have run an extremely slick operation, with continuous reassurance that I will be paid on a monthly basis, with a portal showing 'bookings' to units (apartments) and what I would be owed at the end of each month. totally sophisticated and with a smooth talker telling me frequently I will be getting paid. They have scammed me of £5000 and now disappeared off the planet. However I have employed a barrister to investigate this incident.....Watch out Adrian Patrick Keller you and your team, are a disgrace.

Please do not invest with this company its all fabricated,
Lost all are savings from their lies been awaiting to be paid since june/july
/August.
They actually enjoy their lies.
ACTION FRAUD have been notified.
Caused a stroke due to their lies chasing everyday will be common place,
This review can be deleted as soon a a payment can be received.

Don’t go near these frauds…
Scammers

SalusLiving.co.uk
staywithsalus.com
saluscapitalgroup.com
scalewithsalus.com

Harry sweetmore. Company is trading as OPG Holdings. The company claims to be operated by another firm, yet refuses to disclose who that company actually is.

Funny how they have OPG Holdings operating under multiple names including Salus Living, Salus Care Services, Salus Capital, and OPG Developments and state it on their website, which has now been removed.

Over 20 investors have been misled with promises of returns backed by “secured assets.” Investors were strung along for years with repeated excuses, delays, and false assurances.

Contracts and agreements were never properly honoured, and terms that were agreed to were consistently ignored.

False claims of asset backing were repeatedly used to gain investor confidence. Investors were assured their money was secured against assets, but these claims have been entirely fabricated.

False documents and misleading information were allegedly provided in order to obtain funds from investors.

For years, investors were continuously given false updates and empty promises. New agreements would be signed, but nothing was ever followed through. Documents appeared to mean nothing, and there seemed to be no issue with lying repeatedly just to keep investors holding on that their money would eventually be returned within the agreed terms.

Proceedings will now continue without further notice.