Sometimes articles are useful, but not very often. It seems to be mostly self-opinionated, would be scientists. Worst of all the narration online of some of the articles is now being done by people w... Ver más
La empresa ha respondido
Aunque no verificamos reclamaciones concretas porque las opiniones son propiedad de sus autores, es posible que marquemos las opiniones como «verificadas» si podemos confirmar que ha tenido lugar una interacción con la empresa. Más información
Para proteger la integridad de la plataforma, nuestro software automatizado disponible las 24 horas examina todas las opiniones en nuestra plataforma, tanto si están verificadas como si no. Esta tecnología está diseñada para identificar y eliminar contenido que incumpla nuestras directrices, incluidas las opiniones que no están basadas en una experiencia real. Sabemos que es posible que no detectemos todo pero puedes denunciar lo que pienses que se nos haya escapado. Más información
Sometimes articles are useful, but not very often. It seems to be mostly self-opinionated, would be scientists. Worst of all the narration online of some of the articles is now being done by people w... Ver más
La empresa ha respondido
Used to be brilliant, since it’s takeover by a company more interested in equality of outcome rather than science it seems to have become more like ‘hello’ magazine. One recent article called for the... Ver más
La empresa ha respondido
Took out time limited offer and cancelled in good time. They ignored cancellation and took further £65 from card. They reluctantly agreed to refund within ten working days. At end of period said probl... Ver más
La empresa ha respondido
You start a trial with the intention of giving the product a go. You set up a reminder on your calendar to either cancel or continue with subscription. They process the renewal charge more than one... Ver más
La empresa ha respondido
Science news and science articles from New Scientist
2 Derry Street, W8 5TT, London, Reino Unido
No consta que haya invitado a opinar recientemente
Esta empresa no ha enviado invitaciones a sus clientes recientemente, por lo que es posible que las opiniones no sean representativas
Ha contestado el 96% de las opiniones negativas
Suele responder en menos de 48 horas
Así usa esta empresa Trustpilot
Descubre cómo se obtienen, puntúan y moderan sus opiniones y valoraciones.
I have been trying to move my subscription date by two weeks. The contact centre in Australia is absolutely awful. No customer service. No help - useless. I have been a subscriber for years but ask them a simple question and you get no where. NS used to have some credibility. Now they are as bad as other non customer focussed companies. Shocking.

Respuesta de New Scientist
I took a print gift subscription but 8 weeks later had not received a copy. 7 or 8 queries went unanswered, except for one, querying the name of the recipient, but never answering the simple question, when will the first copy arrive? In frustration, I asked if it was easier to cancel than just deliver, or, even, tell me when delivery would commence. They simply cancelled, a relief, but they literally threw a year's subscription back rather than answer a query. It remains to be seen if they return the money, though they indicate they will.

Respuesta de New Scientist
I love the journal/magazine - it is full of interesting stuff. But I wish they would do something about their paper-copy mailing department. It is useless. Copies are invariably late and sometimes come three together. If they cant pay enough staff to have a mailroom they should not offer paper copies.

Respuesta de New Scientist
Brilliant science journalism, but I wish they would sort their app out. It's slow and there is no quick way to go back to where you were in a previous magazine, it takes ages to manually find your place again (there is a bookmark function but you can't continue through the magazine that way). and now the audio versions aren't working at all.

Respuesta de New Scientist
These people are thieves - be very very careful. Impossible to get your refunds and extremely hard to stop subscriptions. Based in India - Ankit and team are terrible.
The team in UK seem to be equally inadequate. Terry was a liar and made false promises. Over 27 calls, 8 hours and 47 emails to sort it out. Every single person related a different story as to why it wasn't done. Promise after promise. A 78 year old is poor and in financial hardship, they will not stop his subscription. No food to eat but NS team are stealing his monies.

Respuesta de New Scientist
Avoid the subscription. Having been a subscriber for well over 20 years I've now cancelled.
For over 4 weeks I've not been able to access the print version (they blame postal strikes for it not arriving), web or app version. I've tried to contact the support team for over a month, just to be placed on hold, emails are not replied to. I've had nothing in return for my money. Gone from good to little more than a money grabbing rude scam outfit, offering near zero product or service.

Respuesta de New Scientist
This is a lovely magazine where various scientific knowledge is shared. I'm a student who is quite inquisitive and interested in science. For me, it helps me to know about what's going on in our world and what positive and negative news we have.
It's worth its cost. It's worth reading. By reading it I can realize how much I have more to discover. Especially, I enjoy reading it on the train. I'm going to collect as many as I can!

Respuesta de New Scientist
Recently had new promotional ads sent to me. I did contemplate signing back up again— maybe their awful editorial team had moved on and been replaced? Well looking on Trust pilot and the steady flow of awful reviews I take that as a no. Looks like this platform has saved my bacon. No thanks you New Scientist.

Respuesta de New Scientist
Subscription scam making me hate a great magazine. They auto-renew your subscription without any warning and the customer relations over the phone just keep on repeating the same lie following a frustrating script. Promised to call me to investigate my case and never did... just winning time so my payment can be taken from me. Very sad that this is the customer experience from a magazine I really liked. Have no intention of subscribing to it again, nor buying a single issue. Very sad. Taking A LOT of money from me without my consent.
They are charging me, without my consent, for almost double the amount I've subscribed to them in the past. Shame on you... very sad this great magazine need to rely on this trick to keep customers. You are actually destroying the feeling of a good experience. Very sad.

Respuesta de New Scientist
Great publication ruined by shady business practices. Auto-renews without notification, customer support only available during work hours if you can even get through - I kept being disconnected before even getting through to a human. E-mails are simply ignored. Despite having a shelf's worth of books by New Scientist, I won't be buying from them again.

Respuesta de New Scientist
It’s a good magazine but the subscription cancellation and billing process is abysmal. I was charged more than the stated period before the end of the subscription at a rate more than twice the yearly period before without any warning or choice. You can only cancel by calling the help line (online message was not responded to). The refund was supposedly processed yesterday (more than 2 weeks since the cancellation and 4 weeks after the payment) and now told it will take another week for it to appear in my statement.
This is not service at the level people expect (and receive) from other similar services. Avoid.

Respuesta de New Scientist
I'm a subscriber but to date I've never received a single edition on time. I've constantly had to be after them to chase up the whereabouts of my issues. I've never had problems with other magazine subscriptions. This company must be deliberately withholding issues or some serious fundamental administration problems at play. Either way you never get what you pay for as a subscriber so certainly one to avoid!

Respuesta de New Scientist
Took out time limited offer and cancelled in good time. They ignored cancellation and took further £65 from card. They reluctantly agreed to refund within ten working days. At end of period said problem with card so must give my bank details. Now saying will be another 10-14 working days before refund. They are just using this to get interest free loans.

Respuesta de New Scientist
(update below)
I discovered that the company kept my credit card on file, so I wrote as asked them to delete it. The response I get did not address my question; it only told me how to cancel a future renewal. Avoid this company unless you want to lose control of your cards.
(update, in reply to the company's response to the above)
Thank you for your prompt reply. I subsequently received email indicating that you retain my card on file -- but it's encrypted, so you can't use it to charge me for renewal. This is nonsense. My yearly subscription was paid, so you have no reason to keep my card on file, encrypted or not. I ask you again to delete all record of my credit card.
FYI, here is my original email:
"You have my credit card number on file. Please delete this immediately, as I do NOT EVER leave my credit details after I've paid. Thank you!"
Here is your response:
"Please be advised that this subscription to New Scientist is paid by continuous credit card authority. The subscription will renew automatically unless we receive a cancellation request and then no further payments will be taken."
You have yet to address my security issue, so still not acceptable.

Respuesta de New Scientist
I've subscribed for 3 months and my plan inclyued printed magazine on 26th of December. I havent gotten an issue by 6 of Februray and when I contacted they told me they have sent but it is probably lost in the mail. It's 20th of February and still no issues. But I get deliveries from China on time. And again from Britain. So it is not that difficult, is it?

Respuesta de New Scientist
Count the titles containing a question mark, the words "may/might", "can/could/should/would" or anything else defining the article as guesswork, add Netflix and book reviews and you'll realize New Scientist has hardly anything scientific to publish anymore. Historical scientific data is forever hidden behind a subscription fee, where NS declares itself owner instead of the scientists who did the research. This revenue model is sick and needs to be replaced urgently.
Having subscribed for a trial period of NS, I can certainly relate to the reviews here. What bothers me big time is the plethora of animated pop up ads. Very hard to read an article while being distracted by ads jiggling around on the page. Having paid good money to read the magazine on line, I don't see why I should have to put up with this unwanted rubbish. After much thought, I have decided cancel and just by the mag from my local newsagent.

Respuesta de New Scientist
These people just don`t let go, they keep spamming after sub finished. Beware, they will inundate you with e mails and even phone calls. There is no-where on e mails that has an unsubscribe link. They are pests and I didn`t like their very expensive magazine at all. Waste of money. I would not recommend a sub to anyone

Respuesta de New Scientist
After the prices were raised I can get 71 percent cheaper - ...what a laugh!
I really don't care how much the print and the post may cost you. If you have something to share you can make a subscription just for the web at a reasonable price. In order to get information is no really need for print anymore.
Running for easy money to satisfy the urgent pleasures. You are just another bad example of covetousness.

Respuesta de New Scientist
New Scientist renewed my subscription, without my permission, after sending me a letter that stated I would have to contact them to renew. I was told that I would not be refunded, but the new subscription would terminate with the issue dated 1st January 2022. The last issue I was able to download was 4th December! This company is dispicable, I believe that is twice that they have stolen from me. Avoid.
Update:
Clearly customer services are not reading these reviews, just picking out keywords!
Update 06/01/2022:
After getting in touch with New Scientist through Facebook on 18/12/2021, I have still not had the issue resolved. I received a Facebook message yesterday and was told that they had not received an email from me. Sent them a screenshot of the email and also their email confirming when my subscription ran out. I found the thread in my deleted emails and restored it. If you are foolish enough to subscribe, keep ALL your correspondence. They seem to be working off the premise that you will not! Awaiting their response...

Respuesta de New Scientist
Cualquiera puede escribir una reseña en Trustpilot. El autor de la opinión tiene derecho a editarla o eliminarla en cualquier momento y solo se mostrará mientras su cuenta esté activa.
Trabajamos con especialistas y tecnología avanzada para salvaguardar nuestra plataforma. Descubre cómo combatimos las reseñas falsas.
Más información sobre el proceso de revisión de Trustpilot.
La verificación puede ayudar a garantizar que sean personas reales las que escriben opiniones que aparecen en Trustpilot.
Ofrecer incentivos a cambio de opiniones o pedirlas de forma selectiva puede sesgar el TrustScore, lo que contraviene nuestras directrices.